Search found 24 matches

by alx_max
Wed Nov 02, 2016 7:51 am
Forum: SRWare Iron Support (English)
Topic: New Iron-Version: 54.0.2850.0 Stable for Windows
Replies: 56
Views: 68260

Re: New Iron-Version: 54.0.2850.0 Stable for Windows

I'm back with some feedback ;) . With the new installation kit, Iron is able to log me in to my Google account. The resource.pak works too.
by alx_max
Tue Nov 01, 2016 7:05 am
Forum: SRWare Iron Support (English)
Topic: New Iron-Version: 54.0.2850.0 Stable for Windows
Replies: 56
Views: 68260

Re: New Iron-Version: 54.0.2850.0 Stable for Windows

Hi, I have downloaded Iron 54 minutes ago and I get the Google Account login problem too.
by alx_max
Mon Feb 08, 2016 10:58 am
Forum: SRWare Iron Support (English)
Topic: New Iron-Version: 48.0.2550.2 Stable for Windows
Replies: 85
Views: 113010

Re: New Iron-Version: 48.0.2550.0 Stable for Windows

Hi, I am against embedding the Flash Installation kit in the Iron installation kit. Could you, please, remove it?
by alx_max
Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:33 pm
Forum: SRWare Iron Support (English)
Topic: New Iron-Version: 47.0.2500.0 Stable for Windows
Replies: 60
Views: 70495

Re: New Iron-Version: 47.0.2500.0 Stable for Windows

I am back with a workaround as answer to the question How can the tab discarding be disabled? There is a parameter in the command line which can be used for that. Just use the --force-fieldtrials command line option like this: "C:\Program Files\SRWare Iron\chrome.exe" --force-fieldtrials=AutomaticTa...
by alx_max
Mon Dec 28, 2015 3:09 pm
Forum: SRWare Iron Support (English)
Topic: New Iron-Version: 47.0.2500.0 Stable for Windows
Replies: 60
Views: 70495

Re: New Iron-Version: 47.0.2500.0 Stable for Windows

Chrome developers have introduced a new feature, Tab Discarding , which is supposed to discard the data in a tab that is in the background and is not used for some time. More details here: https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2015/09/tab-discarding . In theory, it can be enabled or disabled usi...
by alx_max
Tue May 05, 2015 4:39 pm
Forum: SRWare Iron Support (English)
Topic: HOW TO ACTIVATE PPAPI-FLASH
Replies: 81
Views: 276576

Re: HOW TO ACTIVATE PPAPI-FLASH

I have noticed the PPAPI Flash plugin was installed in the same directory as the NPAPI plugin: c:\Windows\System32\Macromed\Flash for the 64 bit architecture and c:\Windows\SysWOW64\Macromed\Flash for the 32 bit one. Personally, I have never changed the intallation directory of the PPAPI plugin so c...
by alx_max
Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:37 am
Forum: SRWare Iron Support (English)
Topic: New Iron-Version: 28.0.1550.1 Stable for Windows
Replies: 86
Views: 120881

Re: New Iron-Version: 28.0.1550.1 Stable for Windows

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324170004578635812623154242.html?mod=googlenews_wsj#project%3DGOOGLE0731%26articleTabs%3Dinteractive Chrom - google <---> Iron What can you cut against the google info I see the hunger in the Sun Sun is not everything, but you are browsing for Google to...
by alx_max
Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:52 pm
Forum: SRWare Iron Support (English)
Topic: New Iron-Version: 25.0.1400.0 Stable for Windows
Replies: 63
Views: 89487

Re: New Iron-Version: 25.0.1400.0 Stable for Windows

vmq6695 wrote:MathML is turned off (see https://eyeasme.com/Joe/MathML/MathML_browser_test)
Although the MathML implementation in Chromium is not so bright, is there any way to turn it back on via chrome://flags or something similar?
by alx_max
Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:11 pm
Forum: SRWare Iron Support (English)
Topic: Native H.264 and WebGL support in Iron?
Replies: 18
Views: 16027

Re: Native H.264 and WebGL support in Iron?

Then is there a way to use the system installed codecs in order to get the H264 support?
by alx_max
Tue Aug 14, 2012 6:48 pm
Forum: SRWare Iron Support (English)
Topic: New Iron-Version: 21.0.1200.0 Stable for Windows
Replies: 58
Views: 92461

Re: New Iron-Version: 21.0.1200.0 Stable for Windows

I've noticed in chrome://plugins/ a message saying the Java plug-in was outdated. I have checked it and my computer did have the last version. Is there a bug in some validation routine?