Iron Review at Techbu

Iron Forum for english speaking people

Post Reply
User avatar
SRWare
Site Admin
Posts: 3247
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:16 am

Iron Review at Techbu

Post by SRWare »

http://techbu.com/2012/10/04/google-chr ... le-browser
techbu.com wrote: As you can see SRWare Iron is not only protects your personal information from Google, but also goes low on CPU and Memory resource usage. On top of that all the Google Chrome plugins works with SRWare browser.
Iron-Updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/srware

Donations via Paypal and Bitcoin:
http://iron-start.com/spenden.php
Onyx50
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:44 pm

Re: Iron Review at Techbu

Post by Onyx50 »

techbu.com wrote: On top of that all the Google Chrome plugins works with SRWare browser.
Howdy! I'm not so sure about that statement. Can anyone explain why both "External noreferrer" and\or "Referer Control" do not seem to work? "Referer Control" seems far more advanced and would be an excellent addition to this privacy based browser!

Using 21.0.1200.0 (Developer Build 151001) for XP Pro 32.

I have the ability to at least block referrer with all other browsers including SM, FF, Opera.
We also noticed that the Comodo Dragon claims to do this [natively],
but not sure if those extensions will work with that browser either.

Thanks for any help!
mapx
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Iron Review at Techbu

Post by mapx »

Onyx50
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:44 pm

Re: Iron Review at Techbu

Post by Onyx50 »

mapx wrote:did you try kiss privacy ?
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/deta ... hmpbgmffii
Sorry it's taken this long to get back here.

Thanks for the tip on KISS... yes - for the most part it seems to work and it does block [url] referrer from most sites.
However, I ran into one that it didn't seem to block. I'll see if I can dig it up and let you know. But again, it works overall.

Thanks again mapx!
Post Reply